John 1:35

Τῇ ἐπαύριον πάλιν εἱστήκει ὁ Ἰωάννης, καὶ ἐκ τῶν μαθητῶν αὐτοῦ δύο·

RBT Greek Interlinear:

Strongs 3588; Tē; Τῇ; the; Art-DFS

Strongs 1887; epaurion; ἐπαύριον; next day; Adv

Strongs 3825; palin; πάλιν; back; Adv

Strongs 2476; heistēkei; εἱστήκει; had been standing; V-LIA-3S

Strongs 3588; ho; ὁ; the; Art-NMS

Strongs 2491; Iōannēs; Ἰωάννης; Favored; N-NMS

Strongs 2532; kai; καὶ; and; Conj

Strongs 1537; ek; ἐκ; from out; Prep

Strongs 3588; tōn; τῶν; the; Art-GMP

Strongs 3101; mathētōn; μαθητῶν; learners; N-GMP

Strongs 846; autou; αὐτοῦ; himself; PPro-GM3S

Strongs 1417; dyo; δύο; two; Adj-NMP

RBT Hebrew Literal:

Doubled- He Was always standing firm, Tomorrow

On the Tomorrow the Favored had been standing ready backwards,^55b and from out of the Learners of Himself, two.

Yesterday | Today | Tomorrow
Standing firm, upright. "Those who walk" are those selves comprehended in chronos time and who can only see what is directly in front of them. Standing firm in the center of the wheel of time means a timeless state, seeing all from beginning to end.

The dual man of heaven is a prophet of himself— he stands firm and walks at the same time, this means he looks at what is directly in front of himself and also at what is coming at the end.

---

This is what it means to "flatten" the text into completely pointless sayings devoid of any value whatsoever:

"The next day again John was standing with two of his disciples"

(Every other translation)

Multiply this flattening methodology by the tens of thousands, and presto, you have a book no can read, or wants to read, or is a truly arduous chore to read, leaving all to vainly hope someone can explain all the nonsense via "spiritual gifting."

Julia Smith Literal 1876 Translation:
Again on the morrow John stood, and two of his disciples;

LITV Translation:
Again on the morrow, and two from his disciples stood.

ESV Translation:
Error retrieving verse.

Footnotes

55b

εἱστήκει

“He had stood” or “he had been standing”

This form describes a past completed state with continued result in the past, prior to another past action — the pluperfect nuance.

Without the understanding of eternity, translators force the semantics here into the constraints of time and place, thus the translations have been incorrect, and missed the intention.